Categories
- ACTUARIAL DATA SCIENCE
- AFIR / ERM / RISK
- ASTIN / NON-LIFE
- BANKING / FINANCE
- DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
- EDUCATION
- HEALTH
- IACA / CONSULTING
- LIFE
- PENSIONS
- PROFESSIONALISM
- THOUGHT LEADERSHIP
- MISC
ICA LIVE: Workshop "Diversity of Thought #14
Italian National Actuarial Congress 2023 - Plenary Session with Frank Schiller
Italian National Actuarial Congress 2023 - Parallel Session on "Science in the Knowledge"
Italian National Actuarial Congress 2023 - Parallel Session with Lutz Wilhelmy, Daniela Martini and International Panelists
Italian National Actuarial Congress 2023 - Parallel Session with Kartina Thompson, Paola Scarabotto and International Panelists
9 views
0 comments
0 likes
0 favorites
In many actuarial calculations today, it is no longer sufficient to simply derive best estimates; instead, it is expected that the possible fluctuations in the outcome beyond these best estimates are also quantified and account for. This certainly applies when carrying out a solvency exercise, but also when deriving the risk margin of loss reserves or determining the cost of capital of a tariff. The parameter risk is an often-neglected component of these deviations from the best estimate. Of course, this risk component can be small if the data sample is large and of good quality, but it may be large or indeed dominate when there is little data or data is inconsistent. Possibly a large parameter error may even be symptomatic of an inadequate model. We present here a straightforward and general method to account for the uncertainties that arise when calibrating the parameters of any actuarial model, by sampling the probability distribution of the parameters, which arises implicitly from a chi-squared fit.
0 Comments
There are no comments yet. Add a comment.